The Trump Administration Announces Major Policy Change Restricting Employee 'Green Card' Visa Eligibility



Applicants Generally Must Be Outside the U.S. When Applying for 'Green Card' Permanent Residency Status


In a significant policy change, the administration recently announced that, effective immediately, applicants for permanent ‘green card’ visa status generally must be physically outside the U.S. at the time of their application.


Recent data shows that 70% of employment-based applicants historically have pursued ‘green card’ permanent residency while remaining in the U.S. through a process known as ‘adjustment of status’. This shift requiring an applicant to apply physically outside the U.S. substantially restricts the primary permanent residency route and may result in a significant hurdle to employer permanent residency sponsorship programs.


However, the administration has indicated there may be flexibility regarding the application of this new requirement.


What Has Changed?


In its press release, U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) stated that “an alien who is in the U.S. temporarily and wants a Green Card must return to their home country to apply, except in extraordinary circumstances.”


In contrast, in a related policy memorandum issued the day before the press release, USCIS took a more measured approach, reaffirming existing law that ‘adjustment of status’ is “a matter of discretion”. Government officers are directed to weigh all positive and negative factors in each case, including compliance with immigration status and prior conduct in the U.S.


The government likely will scrutinize cases with an emphasis on negative discretionary factors, such as status violations, failures to depart the U.S. when required, or conduct inconsistent with the purpose of the previously approved temporary visa. This means employers and employees likely will need to submit substantial additional documentation to argue for a positive exercise of discretion in each case.

 

Importantly, USCIS also notes that holding “dual intent” nonimmigrant status, such as H-1B or L-1, is “not sufficient, on its own, to warrant a favorable exercise of discretion.”


Future interpretation by USCIS is unclear at this time, but a substantial increase in USCIS requests for evidence and in-person interviews would likely result in processing delays and an increase in denials.


This remains true, even with USCIS’ reported recent statements to multiple news outlets that the policy should have “no noticeable impact on highly qualified applicants and skilled professionals who have followed the law.”


What Has Not Changed


‘Adjustment of status’ remains available as a route to a green card, and USCIS will continue processing applications. And, as in the past, USCIS must continue to provide to the applicant an analysis of discretionary positive and negative factors when denying an adjustment of status application.


Careful evaluation by employers of employees’ eligibility for ‘adjustment of status’ has always been necessary, but it becomes substantially more important under this new guidance.


What Should Employers Do Now?


Although the full impact will depend on how the government applies this new guidance in practice, employers should take a proactive approach and consider taking the following steps –


  • Identify currently pending ‘adjustment of status’ cases and proactively prepare strong evidence to demonstrate applicants are “highly qualified”


  • Evaluate timing strategies for green card sponsorship of sponsored employees, including whether it is advisable, and practical, for them to leave the U.S. to apply abroad


  • Ensure your organization’s anticipated ‘green card’ applicants maintain current temporary status, as status violations could undercut ‘adjustment of status’ applications


  • Analyze your ‘green card’ eligible sponsored employee population to assess the potential business disruption if some or all must apply from outside the U.S.


Silberman Law will continue to monitor this developing situation to ensure employers have the best available information to inform sponsorship decisions.


*  *  *  * 


If you have questions about this Alert or want immigration law advice or guidance, please contact the Silberman Law legal professional with whom you work, or simply reply to this Alert


June 9, 2026
On June 8, a federal district court in Massachusetts struck down, on a nationwide basis, the administration’s $100,000 H-1B visa fee requirement, which it had implemented in September 2025.
Colorado AI
May 28, 2026
Colorado employers using artificial intelligence in employment decision-making need to prepare for new compliance obligations. On May 14, 2026, Colorado enacted the new law - SB 26-189 - substantially revising the state’s prior artificial intelligence law and establishing new requirements for organizations that use ‘au
May 20, 2026
Federal Agencies Closely Coordinate to Increase Immigration Enforcement Against Employers DOJ Sues & DOL Suspends Federal Contractors Face Particular Risks Under False Claims Act
June 9, 2026
On June 8, a federal district court in Massachusetts struck down, on a nationwide basis, the administration’s $100,000 H-1B visa fee requirement, which it had implemented in September 2025.
Colorado AI
May 28, 2026
Colorado employers using artificial intelligence in employment decision-making need to prepare for new compliance obligations. On May 14, 2026, Colorado enacted the new law - SB 26-189 - substantially revising the state’s prior artificial intelligence law and establishing new requirements for organizations that use ‘au
May 20, 2026
Federal Agencies Closely Coordinate to Increase Immigration Enforcement Against Employers DOJ Sues & DOL Suspends Federal Contractors Face Particular Risks Under False Claims Act
May 18, 2026
Since 1966, private employers with 100 or more employees have been required to annually file EEO-1 reports, requiring employers to submit the race/ethnicity and sex of each of its employees by EEO job category and workforce location. Similarly, non-private entities have been required to file EEO-2, EEO-3, EEO-4, or EEO
April 24, 2026
Effective today, federal agencies must include in new contracts detailed language requiring contractors to certify they “will not engage in any racially discriminatory DEI activities” and that contractors agree to submit to federal agencies detailed data, documents, and responses to agency inquiries
March 30, 2026
On March 26, 2026, President Trump issued a new Executive Order “Addressing DEI Discrimination by Federal Contractors” (“EO”) along with an explanatory Fact Sheet. The new EO states that – “DEI activities are not only unethical and often illegal, but also cause inefficiencies, waste, and abuse within entities that
March 19, 2026
First, the good news – if you are not employed at a college or university, you need not read further. For those in education, please read on. A federal district court temporarily blocked the collection of expanded IPEDS data on applicants for admission. As we previously shared, the National Center for Education Stati
February 12, 2026
Based on Federal 9th Circuit Court Decision, OFCCP to Disclose Five Years of Government Contractors' EEO-1 Reports OFCCP Announced It Will Release the Reports to The Center for Investigative Reporting on February 25, 2026
Reports Are Due May 13, 2026
February 5, 2026
The California Pay Data Reporting Portal is now open and employers have until Wednesday May13th, 2026 to submit their Payroll Employee and Labor Contractor Reports to the CRD.
Blue title slide:
January 22, 2026
Annual California Pay Data Reporting is upon us again. This year’s deadline, for both Payroll Employee and Labor Contractor Employee Reports, is May 13, 2026.