U.S. Supreme Court Upholds Birthright Citizenship for All Children Born in U.S., Regardless of Parents' Immigration Status


Landmark Decision Provides Clarity for Employers, Employees, and Their Families

The U.S. Supreme Court, in its recent decision in Trump v. Barbara, concluded that the 14th Amendment guarantees citizenship to all children born in the United States, regardless of their parents’ immigration status.


Siding with over a century of federal court precedent, the Supreme Court struck down the Trump administration’s Executive Order (“EO”) denying citizenship to children born to parents with unlawful or temporary immigration status.


This decision maintains the status quo, avoiding a major shift in U.S. immigration policy that would have created deep uncertainty for not only employers, but also many employees and their families.


A Divided Court and the Potential for Congressional Action


While the decision was 6 to 3, Justice Kavanaugh, siding with the majority, found the EO violated only a federal statute, not the 14th amendment. This left only five justices finding the EO illegal on constitutional grounds.


Why does that matter? Because if one member of the five-justice majority departs the court, or changes their mind, the U.S. Congress could seek to end birthright citizenship by passing a new law. Potential legislation is already being discussed, though the success of such a law likely is low.


What Does this Mean for Employers?



With this decision, employers have needed clarity, avoiding potential career and life disruptions for many employees and their families.


However, expect the Trump administration to continue to make changes affecting workplace-based immigration programs. Employers must remain alert to changes that could impact immigration compliance obligations and foreign employee work authorization.


*   *   *   *


Silberman Law will continue to monitor and report on these developments.


If you have questions about this Alert or want immigration law advice and guidance, please contact the Silberman law legal professional with whom you work, or simply reply to this Alert.


July 7, 2026
In 1979, the EEOC published “Affirmative Action Appropriate Under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act Of 1964”. 29 C.F.R Part 1608 (“the Guidance”) which provided guidance to employers electing to implement voluntary affirmative action programs.
June 9, 2026
On June 8, a federal district court in Massachusetts struck down, on a nationwide basis, the administration’s $100,000 H-1B visa fee requirement, which it had implemented in September 2025.
June 4, 2026
In a significant policy change, the administration recently announced that, effective immediately, applicants for permanent ‘green card’ visa status generally must be physically outside the U.S. at the time of their application.
July 7, 2026
In 1979, the EEOC published “Affirmative Action Appropriate Under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act Of 1964”. 29 C.F.R Part 1608 (“the Guidance”) which provided guidance to employers electing to implement voluntary affirmative action programs.
June 9, 2026
On June 8, a federal district court in Massachusetts struck down, on a nationwide basis, the administration’s $100,000 H-1B visa fee requirement, which it had implemented in September 2025.
June 4, 2026
In a significant policy change, the administration recently announced that, effective immediately, applicants for permanent ‘green card’ visa status generally must be physically outside the U.S. at the time of their application.
Colorado AI
May 28, 2026
Colorado employers using artificial intelligence in employment decision-making need to prepare for new compliance obligations. On May 14, 2026, Colorado enacted the new law - SB 26-189 - substantially revising the state’s prior artificial intelligence law and establishing new requirements for organizations that use ‘au
May 20, 2026
Federal Agencies Closely Coordinate to Increase Immigration Enforcement Against Employers DOJ Sues & DOL Suspends Federal Contractors Face Particular Risks Under False Claims Act
May 18, 2026
Since 1966, private employers with 100 or more employees have been required to annually file EEO-1 reports, requiring employers to submit the race/ethnicity and sex of each of its employees by EEO job category and workforce location. Similarly, non-private entities have been required to file EEO-2, EEO-3, EEO-4, or EEO
April 24, 2026
Effective today, federal agencies must include in new contracts detailed language requiring contractors to certify they “will not engage in any racially discriminatory DEI activities” and that contractors agree to submit to federal agencies detailed data, documents, and responses to agency inquiries
March 30, 2026
On March 26, 2026, President Trump issued a new Executive Order “Addressing DEI Discrimination by Federal Contractors” (“EO”) along with an explanatory Fact Sheet. The new EO states that – “DEI activities are not only unethical and often illegal, but also cause inefficiencies, waste, and abuse within entities that
March 19, 2026
First, the good news – if you are not employed at a college or university, you need not read further. For those in education, please read on. A federal district court temporarily blocked the collection of expanded IPEDS data on applicants for admission. As we previously shared, the National Center for Education Stati
February 12, 2026
Based on Federal 9th Circuit Court Decision, OFCCP to Disclose Five Years of Government Contractors' EEO-1 Reports OFCCP Announced It Will Release the Reports to The Center for Investigative Reporting on February 25, 2026